Direkt zum Hauptbereich

#LinearRegression has no existence - #Hegel would say

In #datamining, we are bored by linear regression. It does not work very well and I have personally never seen a qqplot that was strictly on a line, anyway. But besides this practical approach, linear regression (still very popular in social science) seems to have a strong theoretical foundation in the central limit theorem. But here comes an argument derived from Hegel's Logic, why linear regression has no existence at all:
Hegel distinguishes between "bad" infinity and real infinity. Bad infinity is the result of infinite progress. Take 2:7 as an example. If you want to solve this division, you will end up with 0.285714285714... and so on (infinite). Or think about the rock, paper, scissor game: You want to take the good old rock, but then you think, your opponent might think that you want to take rock and therefore will choose paper. So you want to choose scissor, but then you think, your opponent knows that you wanted to take rock but he realized that you had realized that he is going to take paper and therefore you would take scissor, so he will take rock and you should take paper, and so on.
Real infinity in contrast, is limited. That sounds like a contradiction, but - well it is dialectic. Think about a circle within another circle.
 
If the size of the orange circle can change arbitrary, how many possibilities are there for the size of the blue space? Infinite! Nevertheless, the blue space is limited by the two circles. Real infinity is a relation of different quanta. Otherwise, it would be everything (“absolutes Sein”) which is the same as nothing (“absolutes Nichts”). But everything that really is (the existence or “Dasein”) is not nothing but is becoming (“Werden”) and disappearing (“Verschwinden”).
This is true for mathematics, as well. The right answer to the problem of dividing 2 by 7 is 2/7 (as fraction). As a relation, it has no deficit. You can add 5/7 and you will get exactly 1.

It is obvious that linear regression is always bad infinity. You can always move one further on the x-axis to find another y and there is no relation, no limit.
The alternative would be a non-linear regression. The function of a linear regression is
y = a + bx + e.
y is determined by this function, a, b and e are constants. But x is a pure quantity. It can be anything and therefore drives the whole function to bad infinity. But if we take
y = a + bx² + e,
then x has a relation: x is the unity and 2 is quantity. Therefore, x is a pure quality. As a consequence, only functions which have an x to be to the power of n>1 have an existence. q.e.d.

Kommentare

Beliebte Posts aus diesem Blog

#RTutorial: Using R to Harvest the Twitter STREAM API

Initializing the Twitter API In this tutorial, the so called STREAMING-API from Twitter is used. This API provides real-time access to Twitter, so the results are dependent from what is actually going on, right now. Before we start, we have to initialize the Twitter-API. To use the Twitter API, a consumer key and consumer secret is required. Therefore, you have to register as a developer who is creating a Twitter app. Create a Twitter account and then sign in at https://apps.twitter.com/. The account has to be verified with a phone number. This can be done on the Twitter webpage in the account settings. Fill in name, description and any valid URL with leading “http://”. It is important NOT to provide any call-back URL, because otherwise the registration from R will not function. After this, you can see a summary of your newly created app with a link to “manage keys and access tokens”. The consumer key and consumer secret that can be found there have to be copied into the following R-...

Deep-Dive Impfeffektivität: Eine kritische Datenanalyse der RKI-Berechnungen / Teil 1: Die Methode

Die Einschätzung, wie effektiv die COVID-Impfung ist, ist eine der politisch relevantesten Kennzahlen derzeit. Insbesondere für die Einschätzungen der Angemessenheit einr Impfpflicht ist diese Zahl extrem wichtig. In der Vergangenheit hat sich immer wieder gezeigt, dass die Berechnungen des RKI nicht in jeder Hinsicht eindeutig sind, sondern auf vielen Annahmen beruhen, die man auch kritisch hinterfragen kann und muss. Für die politische Datenwissenschaft ist es daher essenziell, diese Berechnungen nachvollziehbar zu machen. In diesem Beitrag wird das methodische Vorgehen des RKI zur Berechnung der Impfeffektivität analysiert. Die Informationen dazu entstammen den RKI-Wochenberichten .  In einem zweiten Teil habe ich die konkreten Berechnungen des RKI so weit wie möglich rekonstruiert und kann daher zeigen, wie stark die Ergebnisse schwanken, wenn Annahmen leicht verändert werden. Meine Erkenntnisse aus der folgenden Analyse: Das RKI verwendet zur Berechnung der Impfeffektivität di...

The Social Science One Facebook Cooperation: A Systemic Failure

This blogpost is a detailed background statement to this comment published in Nature at https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-00828-5 . Fast-Read The following text argues that the Social Science One initiative that is celebrated by Facebook as success is an systemic failure. Privacy concerns are instrumentalized to withhold data from independent researchers while similar data is still available to private companies. The hurdles for researchers at Social Science One are set in a way that it is nearly impossible to study the effect of social media on elections and democracy. This fits to the strategic interest of Facebook to play cooperative but to control the outcomes of research. Social Science One is structured in a way that it is easy for Facebook to instrumentalize this organization. We end with policy recommendations. An appendix shows that the dataset delivered by Facebook is more or less useless. Background Facebook has announced the release of a dataset that is shar...